OpenAI, the company co-founded by Elon Musk, has released a series of emails that seem ‌to indicate Musk’s approval of the company’s transition ‌to a for-profit model. These emails could potentially weaken ⁢Musk’s legal case against the AI‍ venture, according to experts. “I was of the opinion that‍ he⁣ was going to lose⁤ before, but now,‍ I really can’t see​ how he ⁤could win,” one expert commented.

Musk ‌initiated the legal battle against OpenAI, the company⁤ he helped establish. However, OpenAI’s response, filled with evidence,‌ could deal a ‍significant blow to Musk’s lawsuit, experts suggest.

On Tuesday, ‍the AI⁤ firm released a batch of emails that it alleges were exchanged between Musk and its other co-founders.⁢ These⁢ emails seem to suggest that Musk may not have been completely honest in his criticism of OpenAI.

The authenticity of these ​emails, which were partially redacted, could not​ be independently verified‍ by Business Insider.

“OpenAI should be renamed ‘super closed source for maximum profit AI,’ because this is what it actually is,” Musk stated in‌ an apparent​ jab at the company last year during an interview.

Despite Musk’s public statements (and his lawsuit)​ claiming that he did not agree ‍to OpenAI developing a for-profit⁤ branch or moving away from open-source data‍ when he co-founded the company, it appears that Musk not only agreed with the move behind​ closed doors but also advocated for OpenAI to shift ‌towards a for-profit revenue model. In 2018, Musk even forwarded an‍ email suggesting that OpenAI should “attach to Tesla as ‌its cash cow,” according to the document.

“My⁣ probability assessment of⁣ OpenAI being relevant ‌to ⁣DeepMind/Google⁤ without a dramatic change in execution and resources is 0%. Not 1%. I wish it ​were otherwise,” Musk wrote in one email​ to OpenAI’s co-founders in 2018, as⁣ per the company’s release.

These emails could potentially ⁣cause further complications for Musk’s lawsuit.

Experts Doubt Musk’s Chances of Winning

OpenAI’s strong rebuttal is just⁤ one⁢ of⁤ many reasons why Musk⁢ may find it‌ difficult to get his lawsuit past a motion⁢ to dismiss, experts ‍suggest.

Samuel Brunson,⁣ a legal expert in‍ nonprofit law from Loyola University, told Business Insider, “I thought he was going⁢ to lose before, but, at this point, I don’t really see a way⁣ he could win.”

Without a written contract, Musk already faced a steep challenge in ⁣substantiating his argument. ‌In his lawsuit, ‌Musk claimed ‌that OpenAI⁢ deviated from its “founding agreement,” using a few emails and the organization’s certificate of ⁤incorporation as the basis for the alleged contract.

Brunson pointed out that both sides selectively used emails ‍from​ around the same time periods, and questioned, “His argument⁣ is based off a handful of emails, which begs the‌ question: Why wouldn’t these emails be counted as well?”

David Hoffman, a contract law expert⁣ from the University of Pennsylvania, said it’s⁣ unlikely Musk’s case would survive a motion to dismiss. The emails would‌ be most⁤ damaging to Musk if the case were ​to go to trial, which is highly unlikely, according to Hoffman.

Kyle Lawrence, a corporate and securities lawyer ⁣from Falcon Rappaport & Berkman, told BI that the emails currently serve to counter Musk in ‍the court of public ‍opinion.

“A lot of what Elon Musk was doing⁣ was trying to generate negative publicity” for OpenAI, Lawrence said.⁣ “So them releasing these emails‌ is perfectly within their rights and it helps them create‌ the narrative that they’d want to have going into a trial — if it gets to ⁤that.”

However, OpenAI may still pay a price for Musk’s lawsuit in terms of lost time and resources. ‍This follows a ⁣tumultuous few months for OpenAI, which included the CEO’s dismissal and⁤ swift return, a board reshuffle, and⁣ a series of lawsuits and an investigation ⁤by financial ⁢regulators.

“I think Musk’s⁣ lawsuit is already doing what​ he ⁢intended,”​ Hoffman said.​ “This is a⁢ distraction ⁢for OpenAI. They had to spend‌ time getting this together, which is a non-mission-focused activity and probably not a good use of their time.”

Musk’s lawyers declined to comment. Musk ‌has definitely seen the company’s response ‌though, replying to the company on social media without⁢ addressing the contents of the emails.

“Change your name⁤ to ClosedAI and I will drop the ‍lawsuit,” Musk wrote on X.

Musk’s​ lawsuit follows his launch of his own AI company last year.⁤ Musk has stated that he invested tens of millions of dollars into OpenAI during its⁣ founding but stepped⁤ down from ​the company’s board in 2018.

At that time, Musk stated that ‍he ​left to avoid ⁢a potential conflict of interest with Tesla and​ its AI efforts.